• español
    • English
  • Login
  • español 
    • español
    • English
  • Tipos de Publicaciones
    • bookbook partconference objectdoctoral thesisjournal articlemagazinemaster thesispatenttechnical documentationtechnical report
Ver ítem 
  •   IMDEA Networks Principal
  • Ver ítem
  •   IMDEA Networks Principal
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Blocklist Babel: On the Transparency and Dynamics of Open Source Blocklisting

Compartir
Ficheros
paper.pdf (4.059Mb)
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12761/958
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor(es)
Feal, Álvaro; Vallina, Pelayo; Gamba, Julien; Pastrana, Sergio; Nappa, Antonio; Hohlfeld, Oliver; Vallina-Rodriguez, Narseo; Tapiador, Juan
Fecha
2021-05
Resumen
Blocklists constitute a widely-used Internet security mechanism to filter undesired network traffic based on IP/domain reputation and behavior. Many blocklists are distributed in open source form by threat intelligence providers who aggregate and process input from their own sensors, but also from third-party feeds or providers. Despite their wide adoption, many open-source blocklist providers lack clear documentation about their structure, curation process, contents, dynamics, and inter-relationships with other providers. In this paper, we perform a transparency and content analysis of 2,093 free and open source blocklists with the aim of exploring those questions. To that end, we perform a longitudinal 6-month crawling campaign yielding more than 13.5M unique records. This allows us to shed light on their nature, dynamics, inter-provider relationships, and transparency. Specifically, we discuss how the lack of consensus on distribution formats, blocklist labeling taxonomy, content focus, and temporal dynamics creates a complex ecosystem that complicates their combined crawling, aggregation and use. We also provide observations regarding their generally low overlap as well as acute differences in terms of liveness (i.e., how frequently records get indexed and removed from the list) and the lack of documentation about their data collection processes, nature and intended purpose. We conclude the paper with recommendations in terms of transparency, accountability, and standardization.
Compartir
Ficheros
paper.pdf (4.059Mb)
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12761/958
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Listar

Todo IMDEA NetworksPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosPalabras claveTipos de contenido

Mi cuenta

Acceder

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Difusión

emailContacto person Directorio wifi Eduroam rss_feed Noticias
Iniciativa IMDEA Sobre IMDEA Networks Organización Memorias anuales Transparencia
Síguenos en:
Comunidad de Madrid

UNIÓN EUROPEA

Fondo Social Europeo

UNIÓN EUROPEA

Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional

UNIÓN EUROPEA

Fondos Estructurales y de Inversión Europeos

© 2021 IMDEA Networks. | Declaración de accesibilidad | Política de Privacidad | Aviso legal | Política de Cookies - Valoramos su privacidad: ¡este sitio no utiliza cookies!