• español
    • English
  • Login
  • English 
    • español
    • English
  • Publication Types
    • bookbook partconference objectdoctoral thesisjournal articlemagazinemaster thesispatenttechnical documentationtechnical report
View Item 
  •   IMDEA Networks Home
  • View Item
  •   IMDEA Networks Home
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Blocklist Babel: On the Transparency and Dynamics of Open Source Blocklisting

Share
Files
paper.pdf (4.059Mb)
Identifiers
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12761/958
Metadata
Show full item record
Author(s)
Feal, Álvaro; Vallina, Pelayo; Gamba, Julien; Pastrana, Sergio; Nappa, Antonio; Hohlfeld, Oliver; Vallina-Rodriguez, Narseo; Tapiador, Juan
Date
2021-05
Abstract
Blocklists constitute a widely-used Internet security mechanism to filter undesired network traffic based on IP/domain reputation and behavior. Many blocklists are distributed in open source form by threat intelligence providers who aggregate and process input from their own sensors, but also from third-party feeds or providers. Despite their wide adoption, many open-source blocklist providers lack clear documentation about their structure, curation process, contents, dynamics, and inter-relationships with other providers. In this paper, we perform a transparency and content analysis of 2,093 free and open source blocklists with the aim of exploring those questions. To that end, we perform a longitudinal 6-month crawling campaign yielding more than 13.5M unique records. This allows us to shed light on their nature, dynamics, inter-provider relationships, and transparency. Specifically, we discuss how the lack of consensus on distribution formats, blocklist labeling taxonomy, content focus, and temporal dynamics creates a complex ecosystem that complicates their combined crawling, aggregation and use. We also provide observations regarding their generally low overlap as well as acute differences in terms of liveness (i.e., how frequently records get indexed and removed from the list) and the lack of documentation about their data collection processes, nature and intended purpose. We conclude the paper with recommendations in terms of transparency, accountability, and standardization.
Share
Files
paper.pdf (4.059Mb)
Identifiers
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12761/958
Metadata
Show full item record

Browse

All of IMDEA NetworksBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesKeywordsTypes of content

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Dissemination

emailContact person Directory wifi Eduroam rss_feed News
IMDEA initiative About IMDEA Networks Organizational structure Annual reports Transparency
Follow us in:
Community of Madrid

EUROPEAN UNION

European Social Fund

EUROPEAN UNION

European Regional Development Fund

EUROPEAN UNION

European Structural and Investment Fund

© 2021 IMDEA Networks. | Accesibility declaration | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Cookie policy - We value your privacy: this site uses no cookies!