• español
    • English
  • Login
  • English 
    • español
    • English
  • Publication Types
    • bookbook partconference objectdoctoral thesisjournal articlemagazinemaster thesispatenttechnical documentationtechnical report
View Item 
  •   IMDEA Networks Home
  • View Item
  •   IMDEA Networks Home
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Eventual Leader Election with Weak Assumptions on Initial Knowledge, Communication Reliability, and Synchrony

Share
Files
Eventual-leader-election-2010-EN.pdf (370.4Kb)
Identifiers
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12761/150
ISSN: 1666-6038
DOI: 10.1007/s11390-010-1100-9
Metadata
Show full item record
Author(s)
Fernández Anta, Antonio; Jiménez, Ernesto; Raynal, Michel
Date
2010-11
Abstract
This paper considers the eventual leader election problem in asynchronous message-passing systems where an arbitrary number t of processes can crash (t < n, where n is the total number of processes). It considers weak assumptions both on the initial knowledge of the processes and on the network behavior. More precisely, initially, a process knows only its identity and the fact that the process identities are di®erent and totally ordered (it knows neither n nor t). Two eventual leader election protocols and a lower bound are presented. The ¯rst protocol assumes that a process also knows a lower bound ® on the number of processes that do not crash. This protocol requires the following behavioral properties from the underlying network: the graph made up of the correct processes and fair lossy links is strongly connected, and there is a correct process connected to (n ¡ f) ¡ ® other correct processes (where f is the actual number of crashes in the considered run) through eventually timely paths (paths made up of correct processes and eventually timely links). This protocol is not communication-e±cient in the sense that each correct process has to send messages forever. The second protocol is communication-e±cient: after some time, only the ¯nal common leader has to send messages forever. This protocol does not require the processes to know ®, but requires stronger properties from the underlying network: each pair of correct processes has to be connected by fair lossy links (one in each direction), and there is a correct process whose n ¡ f ¡ 1 output links to the rest of correct processes have to be eventually timely. A matching lower bound result shows that any eventual leader election protocol must have runs with this number of eventually timely links, even if all processes know all the processes identities. In addition to being communication-e±cient, the second protocol has another noteworthy e±ciency property, namely, be the run ¯nite or in¯nite, all the local variables and message ¯elds have a ¯nite domain in the run.
Subject
Q Science::Q Science (General)
Q Science::QA Mathematics::QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
T Technology::T Technology (General)
T Technology::TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
T Technology::TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Share
Files
Eventual-leader-election-2010-EN.pdf (370.4Kb)
Identifiers
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12761/150
ISSN: 1666-6038
DOI: 10.1007/s11390-010-1100-9
Metadata
Show full item record

Browse

All of IMDEA NetworksBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesKeywordsTypes of content

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Dissemination

emailContact person Directory wifi Eduroam rss_feed News
IMDEA initiative About IMDEA Networks Organizational structure Annual reports Transparency
Follow us in:
Community of Madrid

EUROPEAN UNION

European Social Fund

EUROPEAN UNION

European Regional Development Fund

EUROPEAN UNION

European Structural and Investment Fund

© 2021 IMDEA Networks. | Accesibility declaration | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Cookie policy - We value your privacy: this site uses no cookies!