Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Underwater LiDAR Signal Processing for Enhanced Detection and Localization of Marine Life
dc.contributor.author | Dubrovinskaya, Elizaveta | |
dc.contributor.author | Dalgleish, Fraser | |
dc.contributor.author | Ouyang, Bing | |
dc.contributor.author | Casari, Paolo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-13T09:34:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-13T09:34:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-05-28 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] J. Karnowski, E. Hutchins, and C. Johnson, “Dolphin detection and tracking,” in Proc. IEEE WACVW, Waikoloa, HI, Jan. 2015. [2] L. Dubbs, A. G. Keeler, and T. O’Meara, “Permitting, risk and marine hydrokinetic energy development,” The Electricity Journal, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 64–74, 2013. [3] A. W. Stoner, C. H. Ryer, S. J. Parker, P. J. Auster, and W. W. Wakefield, “Evaluating the role of fish behavior in surveys conducted with underwater vehicles,” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 1230–1243, 2008. [4] A. E. Copping, B. Polagye, R. Suryan, S. Kramer, J. B. Saracino, and C. Smith, “Instrumentation for monitoring around marine renewable energy converters: Workshop final report,” Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States), Tech. Rep., 2014. [5] Z. Cheng, K. Yang, J. Han, Y. Zhou, L. Sun, W. Li, and M. Xia, “Improved time-of-flight range acquisition technique in underwater lidar experiments,” Applied optics, vol. 54, no. 18, pp. 5715–5725, 2015. [6] S.P.O’Connor,L.J.Mullen,andB.Cochenour,“Underwatermodulated pulse laser imaging system,” Optical Engineering, vol. 53, no. 5, 2014. [7] R. W. Lee, J. K. Nash, B. Cochenour, and L. J. Mullen, “Pulse compression techniques to improve modulated pulsed laser line scan systems,” 2015. [8] F.Dalgleish,B.Ouyang,A.Vuorenkoski,B.Ramos,G.Alsenas,B.Met- zger, Z. Cao, and J. Principe, “Undersea lidar imager for unobtrusive and eye safe marine wildlife detection and classification,” in Proc. MTS/IEEE OCEANS, Aberdeen, Scotland, Jun. 2017. [9] F. M. Caimi. and F. R. Dalgleish, “Performance considerations for continuous-wave and pulsed laser line scan (LLS) imaging systems,” Journal of the European Optical Society, vol. Rapid Publications 5, 2010. [10] F. R. Dalgleish, F. M. Caimi, W. B. Britton, and A. C. F., “Improved LLS imaging performance in scattering-dominant waters,” in Proc. of SPIE, vol. 7317, 2009. [11] F. Dalgleish, A. Vuorenkoski, G. Nootz, B. Ouyang, and F. Caimi, “Experimental study into the performance impact of environmental noise on undersea pulsed laser serial imagers,” Journal of Underwater Acoustics (USN), vol. 61, Oct. 2011. [12] F. R. Dalgleish, A. K. Vuorenkoski, and B. Ouyang, “Extended-range undersea laser imaging: Current research status and a glimpse at future technologies,” Marine Technology Society Journal, vol. 47, pp. 128–147, 2013. [13] C. A. Brock, H. H. Jonsson, J. C. Wilson, J. E. Dye, D. Baumgard- ner, S. Borrmann, M. C. Pitts, M. T. Osborn, R. J. DeCoursey, and D. C. Woods, “Relationships between optical extinction, backscatter and aerosol surface and volume in the stratosphere following the eruption of mt. pinatubo,” Geophysical research letters, vol. 20, no. 22, pp. 2555– 2558, 1993. [14] W. Schro ̈er, J. Ko ̈ser, and F. Kuhnen, “Light–scattering in turbid fluids: The single-scattering intensity,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 2007. [15] M. Ester, H.-P. Kriegel, J. Sander, X. Xu et al., “A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise.” in Proc. KDD, vol. 96, no. 34, Portland, Oregon, 1996, pp. 226–231. [16] H. Edelsbrunner, D. Kirkpatrick, and R. Seidel, “On the shape of a set of points in the plane,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 551–559, 1983. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12761/572 | |
dc.description.abstract | The in situ detection, recognition and tracking of marine animal species is a very important step of field research in the domains of, among others, biology and ecology. Still, the direct observation of marine wildlife through equipment operating in the visible light spectrum is often impaired by the challenging conditions offered by ocean waters, where light can be subject to scattering and attenuation phenomena due to the water turbidity. As the use of powerful lighting may prove ineffective and even induce behavioral changes in marine animals, the design of minimally or non-invasive observation instruments becomes particularly important. In this paper, we consider the serial Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) system under development at the Florida Atlantic University (FAU). This LiDAR design is based on inexpensive components and on low average power red lasers which are subject to significant attenuation in water, but are both eye-safe and invisible to marine life. Considering the challenge of detecting and evaluating the presence of marine wildlife, we present a full processing pipeline for LiDAR data, that includes water turbidity detection, non-gated backscattering compensation, contrast enhancement, and the construction of a three-dimensional model of the detected target. The pipeline is applied to a number of tank test data, under different turbidity conditions. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.title | Underwater LiDAR Signal Processing for Enhanced Detection and Localization of Marine Life | en |
dc.type | conference object | |
dc.conference.date | 28-31 May 2018 | |
dc.conference.place | Kobe, Japan | |
dc.conference.title | MTS/IEEE OCEANS 2018 (OCEANS 2018) | * |
dc.event.type | conference | |
dc.pres.type | paper | |
dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | |
dc.subject.keyword | Underwater imaging | |
dc.subject.keyword | LIDAR | |
dc.subject.keyword | signal processing | |
dc.description.refereed | TRUE | |
dc.description.status | pub | |
dc.eprint.id | http://eprints.networks.imdea.org/id/eprint/1817 |