Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Agundez, Augusto 
dc.contributor.authorPetrovic, Ivana
dc.contributor.authorRadaei, Fatemeh
dc.contributor.authorFife, James
dc.contributor.authorZhou, John
dc.contributor.authorKaras, Hunter
dc.contributor.authorMoody, Scott
dc.contributor.authorDrake, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorJones, Richard N.
dc.contributor.authorEickhoff, Carsten
dc.contributor.authorReznik, Michael E.
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-12T13:14:19Z
dc.date.available2023-12-12T13:14:19Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12761/1765
dc.description.abstractObjective: Delirium is associated with worse outcomes in patients with stroke and neurocritical illness, but delirium detection in these patients can be challenging with existing screening tools. To address this gap, we aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning models that detect episodes of post-stroke delirium based on data from wearable activity monitors in conjunction with stroke-related clinical features. Design: Prospective observational cohort study. Setting: Neurocritical Care and Stroke Units at an academic medical center. Patients: We recruited 39 patients with moderate-to-severe acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and hemiparesis over a 1-year period [mean (SD) age 71.3 (12.20), 54% male, median (IQR) initial NIH Stroke Scale 14.5 (6), median (IQR) ICH score 2 (1)]. Measurements and main results: Each patient received daily assessments for delirium by an attending neurologist, while activity data were recorded throughout each patient’s hospitalization using wrist-worn actigraph devices (on both paretic and non-paretic arms). We compared the predictive accuracy of Random Forest, SVM and XGBoost machine learning methods in classifying daily delirium status using clinical information alone and combined with actigraph data. Among our study cohort, 85% of patients (n = 33) had at least one delirium episode, while 71% of monitoring days (n = 209) were rated as days with delirium. Clinical information alone had a low accuracy in detecting delirium on a day-to-day basis [accuracy mean (SD) 62% (18%), F1 score mean (SD) 50% (17%)]. Prediction performance improved significantly (p < 0.001) with the addition of actigraph data [accuracy mean (SD) 74% (10%), F1 score 65% (10%)]. Among actigraphy features, night-time actigraph data were especially relevant for classification accuracy. Conclusions: We found that actigraphy in conjunction with machine learning models improves clinical detection of delirium in patients with stroke, thus paving the way to make actigraph-assisted predictions clinically actionable.es
dc.description.sponsorshipGlobal Individual Fellowship Marie Skłodowska- Curie Action H2020-MSCA-IF-2020es
dc.description.sponsorshipRhode Island Foundation, Brown University’s Office of the Vice President for Research (OVPR)es
dc.language.isoenges
dc.titleDelirium detection using wearable sensors and machine learning in patients with intracerebral hemorrhagees
dc.typejournal articlees
dc.journal.titleFrontiers in Neurologyes
dc.type.hasVersionAMes
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses
dc.volume.number14es
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fneur.2023.1135472es
dc.page.initial1135472es
dc.relation.projectIDGrant Number: 101027770es
dc.relation.projectNameMAESTROes
dc.relation.projectNameBig Data Collaborative Seed Awardes
dc.subject.keywordStrokees
dc.subject.keywordIntracerebral Hemorrhagees
dc.subject.keywordMachine learninges
dc.subject.keywordWearable Electronic Deviceses
dc.description.refereedTRUEes
dc.description.statuspubes


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record