Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCardona, Juan Camilo 
dc.contributor.authorFrancois, Pierre 
dc.contributor.authorRay, Saikat
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Keyur
dc.contributor.authorLucente, Paolo
dc.contributor.authorMohapatra, Pradosh
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-13T10:09:43Z
dc.date.available2021-07-13T10:09:43Z
dc.date.issued2013-07-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12761/1300
dc.descriptionNetwork Working Group Internet-Draft Intended status: Standards Track Expires: January 12, 2014 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bgp-path-marking-00
dc.description.abstractThe potential advertisement of non-best paths by a BGP speaker supporting the add-path or the best-external extensions makes it difficult for other BGP speakers to identify the paths that have been selected as best by those who advertise them. This information is required for proper operation of some applications. Towards that end, this document proposes marking the paths using extended communities that encode the path type.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleBGP Path Markingen
dc.typetechnical documentation
dc.type.hasVersionAO
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.identifier.doidraft-bgp-path-marking-00
dc.standardization.typeietf_internetdraft
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttp://eprints.networks.imdea.org/id/eprint/756


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record