Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCampagnaro, Filippo
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Federico
dc.contributor.authorFavaro, Federico
dc.contributor.authorSanjuan Calzado, Violeta
dc.contributor.authorForero, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorZorzi, Michele
dc.contributor.authorCasari, Paolo 
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-13T09:26:02Z
dc.date.available2021-07-13T09:26:02Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-24
dc.identifier.citation[1] I. Vasilescu, K. Kotay, D. Rus, P. Corke, and M. Dunbabin, “Data collection, storage and retrieval with an underwater optical and acoustical sensor network,” in Proc. ACM Sensys, San Diego, CA, Nov. 2005. [2] N. Farr, A. Bowen, J. Ware, C. Pontbriand, and M. Tivey, “An integrated, underwater optical/acoustic communications system,” in Proc. IEEE/OES OCEANS, Sydney, Australia, May 2010. [3] “Lumasys, Inc ,” Accessed: Sept. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.lumasys.com/products.html [4] “Ambalux high-bandwidth underwater transceiver,” Accessed: Sept. 2015. [Online]. Available: http: //www.ambalux.com/underwater-transceivers.html [5] “Wireless For Subsea Seatooth,” accessed: Sept. 2015. [Online]. Available: http: //www.wfs-tech.com/index.php/products/seatooth/ [6] X. Che, I. Wells, G. Dickers, P. Kear, and X. Gong, “Re-evaluation of RF electromagnetic communication in underwater sensor networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 143–151, December 2010. [7] B. Gulbahar and O. B. Akan, “A communication theoretical modeling and analysis of underwater magneto-inductive wireless channels,” in IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 11, no. 9, Sep. 2012, pp. 3326–3334. [8] P.-P. Beaujean, J. Spruance, E. A. Carlson, and D. Kriel, “HERMES - A high-speed acoustic modem for real-time transmission of uncompressed image and status transmission in port environment and very shallow water,” in Proc. MTS/IEEE Oceans, Qu ́ebec City, Canada, Sep. 2008. [9] “Evologics underwater SC2R acoustic modem series,” accessed: Sept. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www. evologics.de/en/products/acoustics/index.html [10] F. Campagnaro, F. Favaro, F. Guerra, V. Sanjuan, P. Casari, and M. Zorzi, “Simulation of multimodal optical and acoustic communications in underwater networks,” in Proc. MTS/IEEE Oceans, Genova, Italy, May 2015. [11] S. Basagni, L. B ̈ ol ̈ oni, P. Gjanci, C. Petrioli, C. A. Phillips, and D. Turgut, “Maximizing the value of sensed information in underwater wireless sensor networks via an autonomous underwater vehicle,” in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Toronto, Canada, Apr. 2014. [12] C. Moriconi, S. Betti, M. Tabacchiera, and G. Cupertino, “Hybrid, short range, underwater data channel,” in Proc. MTS/IEEE Oceans, Genova, Italy, May 2015. [13] FMC Technologies, “ROV Systems Comparison,” Accessed: September, 2014. [Online]. Available: {http: //www.fmctechnologies.com/en/SchillingRobotics/ Solutions/Schilling-ROV-Systems.aspx} [14] Submarine Manufacturing and Products, “Product Datasheet, ROV-1000-Model,” Accessed: October, 2014. [Online]. Available: {http://www.smp-ltd.co. uk/tcpdf/datasheets/ROV-1000-Model.pdf} [15] Ageotec, “ROV & UNDERWATER TECHNOLOGIES,” Accessed: Sept., 2015. [Online]. Available: {http://www.ageotec.com/products/ rov-underwater-technologies/} [16] Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, “Autonomous Underwater Vehicles,” Accessed: Sept., 2015. [Online]. Available: {http://www.whoi.edu/main/auvs} [17] F. Campagnaro, F. Favaro, P. Casari, and M. Zorzi, “On the feasibility of fully wireless remote control for underwater vehicles,” in Proc. Asilomar Conf. SS&C, Pacific Grove, CA, Nov. 2014. [18] F. M. Raimondi, M. Trapanese, V. Franzitta, A. Viola, and A. Colucci, “A innovative semi-immergible USV (SI-USV) drone for marine and lakes operations with instrumental telemetry and acoustic data acquisition capability,” in Proc. MTS/IEEE Oceans, Genova, Italy, May 2015. [19] N. A. Cruz, B. M. Ferreira, O. Kebkal, A. C. Matos, C. Petrioli, R. Petroccia, and D. Spaccini, “Investigation of underwater acoustic networking enabling the cooperative operation of multiple heterogeneous vehicles,” Marine Technology Society Journal, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 43–58, 2013. [20] F. Campagnaro, “Design of a wireless remote control for underwater equipment,” Master’s thesis, University of Padova, Italy, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://tesi.cab.unipd.it/46709/1/MasterThesis.pdf [21] E. Hagmann, J. Maye, and A. Breitenmoser, “Underwater acoustic communications in warm shallow water channels,” 2006, accessed: Sept. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/27859 [22] P. Casari et al., “Open-source suites for the underwater networking community: WOSS and DESERT Underwater,” IEEE Network, special issue on “Open Source for Networking: Development and Experimentation”, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 38–46, Sep. 2014. [23] “DESERT Underwater github repository.” , accessed: Sept. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/uwsignet/DESERT Underwater [24] M. Stojanovic, “On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel,” ACM Mobile Comput. and Commun. Review, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 34–43, Oct. 2007.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12761/126
dc.description.abstractWhile the design of reliable and enduring remotely operated vehicles for underwater operations is currently a hot research area, there are not many options to control these systems in real time using wireless telemetry. In particular, a reliable, fully wireless control method that exploits state-of-the-art underwater wireless communication technologies is still lacking. In this paper, we consider the design and engineering of one such multimodal control system comprising optical and acoustic underwater communications, and characterize its performance under different configurations of the communication protocol stack. Compared to previous work, we introduce a proactive mechanism to switch among the components of the multimodal system by means of a signaling mechanism that requires negligible overhead. Our results suggest that a multimodal wireless control system can provide satisfactory control performance by supplying different levels of interaction with the vehicle, depending on the technology in use, and by reliably and timely switching between the available communication technologies.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleSimulation of a Multimodal Wireless Remote Control System for Underwater Vehiclesen
dc.typeconference object
dc.conference.date22-24 October 2015
dc.conference.placeWashington DC, USA
dc.conference.titleThe 10th International Conference on Underwater Networks & Systems (ACM WUWNet 2015)*
dc.event.typeconference
dc.pres.typepaper
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.keywordUnderwater acoustic communications
dc.subject.keywordunderwater optical communications
dc.subject.keywordmultimodal communications
dc.subject.keywordROV
dc.subject.keywordwireless remote control
dc.subject.keywordDESERT Underwater
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttp://eprints.networks.imdea.org/id/eprint/1181


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record