Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFernández Anta, Antonio 
dc.contributor.authorKowalski, Dariusz R. 
dc.contributor.authorMosteiro, Miguel A.
dc.contributor.authorWong, Prudence W. H.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-13T10:03:20Z
dc.date.available2021-07-13T10:03:20Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12761/1202
dc.description.abstractWe study an allocation problem that arises in various scenarios. For instance, a health monitoring system where ambulatory patients carry sensors that must periodically upload physiological data. Another example is participatory sensing, where communities of mobile device users upload periodically information about their environment. We assume that devices or sensors (generically called clients) join and leave the system continuously, and they must upload/download data to static devices (or base stations), via radio transmissions. The mobility of clients, the limited range of transmission, and the possibly ephemeral nature of the clients are modeled by characterizing each client with a life interval and a stations group, so that different clients may or may not coincide in time and/or stations to connect. The intrinsically shared nature of the access to base stations is modeled by introducing a maximum station bandwidth that is shared among its connected clients, a client laxity, which bounds the maximum time that an active client is not transmitting to some base station, and a client bandwidth, which bounds the minimum bandwidth that a client requires in each transmission. Under the model described, we study the problem of assigning clients to base stations so that every client transmits to some station in its group, limited by laxities and bandwidths. We call this problem the Station Assignment problem. We study the impact of the rate and burstiness of the arrival of clients on the solvability of Station Assignment. To carry out a worst-case analysis we use a typical adversarial methodology: we assume the presence of an adversary that controls the arrival and departure of clients. The adversary is limited by two parameters that model the rate and the burstiness of the stations load (hence, limitting the rate and burstiness of the client arrivals). Specifically, we show upper and lower bounds on the rate and burstiness of the arrival for various client arrival schedules and protocol classes. The problem has connections with Load Balancing and Scheduling, usually studied using competitive analysis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the Station Assignment problem is studied under adversarial arrivals.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleStation Assignment with Applications to Sensingen
dc.typeconference object
dc.conference.date5 - 6 September 2013
dc.conference.placeSophia Antipolis, France
dc.conference.titleThe 9th International Symposium on Algorithms and Experiments for Sensor Systems, Wireless Networks and Distributed Robotics (ALGOSENSORS 2013)*
dc.event.typeconference
dc.pres.typepaper
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subject.keywordStation Assignment
dc.subject.keywordPeriodic Sensing
dc.subject.keywordHealth Monitoring Systems
dc.subject.keywordParticipatory Sensing
dc.subject.keywordContinuous Adversarial Dynamics
dc.description.refereedTRUE
dc.description.statuspub
dc.eprint.idhttp://eprints.networks.imdea.org/id/eprint/580


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record