Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Failure Detectors in Homonymous Distributed Systems (with an Application to Consensus)
dc.contributor.author | Arévalo, Sergio | |
dc.contributor.author | Fernández Anta, Antonio | |
dc.contributor.author | Imbs, Damien | |
dc.contributor.author | Jiménez, Ernesto | |
dc.contributor.author | Raynal, Michel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-13T09:55:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-13T09:55:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-06-18 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12761/1086 | |
dc.description | Also in: XX Jornadas de Concurrencia y Sistemas Distribuidos, JCSD 2012, 13-15 June 2012, Pamplona, Spain. | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper is on homonymous distributed systems where processes are prone to crash failures and have no initial knowledge of the system membership (“homonymous” means that several processes may have the same identifier). New classes of failure detectors suited to these systems are first defined. Among them, the classes HΩ and HΣ are introduced that are the homonymous counterparts of the classes Ω and Σ, respectively. (Recall that the pair hΩ,Σi defines the weakest failure detector to solve consensus.) Then, the paper shows how HΩ and HΣ can be implemented in homonymous systems without membership knowledge (under different synchrony requirements). Finally, two algorithms are presented that use these failure detectors to solve consensus in homonymous asynchronous systems where there is no initial knowledge of the membership. One algorithm solves consensus with hHΩ, HΣi, while the other uses only HΩ, but needs a majority of correct processes. Observe that the systems with unique identifiers and anonymous systems are extreme cases of homonymous systems from which follows that all these results also apply to these systems. Interestingly, the new failure detector class HΩ can be implemented with partial synchrony, while the analogous class AΩ defined for anonymous systems can not be implemented(even in synchronous systems). Hence, the paper provides us with the first proof showing that consensus can be solved in anonymous systems with only partial synchrony (and a majority of correct processes). | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.subject.lcc | Q Science::Q Science (General) | |
dc.subject.lcc | Q Science::QA Mathematics::QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science | |
dc.subject.lcc | T Technology::T Technology (General) | |
dc.subject.lcc | T Technology::TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) | |
dc.subject.lcc | T Technology::TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering | |
dc.title | Failure Detectors in Homonymous Distributed Systems (with an Application to Consensus) | en |
dc.type | conference object | |
dc.conference.date | 18-21 June 2012 | |
dc.conference.place | Macau, China | |
dc.conference.title | The 32nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS 2012) | * |
dc.event.type | conference | |
dc.pres.type | paper | |
dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | |
dc.rights.accessRights | open access | |
dc.page.final | 284 | |
dc.page.initial | 275 | |
dc.subject.keyword | Agreement problem | |
dc.subject.keyword | Asynchrony | |
dc.subject.keyword | Consensus | |
dc.subject.keyword | Distributed computability | |
dc.subject.keyword | failure detector | |
dc.subject.keyword | Homonymous system | |
dc.subject.keyword | Message-passing | |
dc.subject.keyword | Process crash | |
dc.description.refereed | TRUE | |
dc.description.status | pub | |
dc.eprint.id | http://eprints.networks.imdea.org/id/eprint/360 |